What happened on 28th April - with your comments
On Friday, it occurred that despite numerous reports about preparations to the Coronation, British support for the monarchy is at an all time low, according to the pre-Coronation poll.
Redditors were merciless.
"That's probably because they're a pointless throwback to when people were physiologically conditioned to believe the paedos were a benefit instead of the blight they actually are."
"I used to respect the queen, just about, until I found out about her covering up for that nonce Andrew. Now I hope she burns in hell."
"The media puff pieces on Charles have been incredible lately. No doubt the palace spends a LOT on PR."
"I always thought I was a monarchist but really I just respected Liz. It should have died with her."
"We're being told to stop moaning about being poorer, at the same time we're supposed to cheer and wave at billionaires in gold carriages..."
That certainly arouse questions like "How can there be a full evaluation of the policy if the government is not properly collecting the data?"
"I just don't understand how this doesn't fall under taxation without representation. You're taxed at 16, but can't vote at 16 [without a suitable ID]. Madness."
"Desperate moves from a party who have no interest in governing, but want to continue having the power, with no accountability."
"So the argument for voter ID was we don't know how bad the situation is because we don't check and the solution to the problem is to not check how the solution is implemented.
Imagine running a business like this.
While people turned away at polling station desks will be recorded, people who are alerted at the door that they will need ID and who then leave will not count, the minister said.
Which makes it even more baffling why the lack of suitable ID will not be recorded."
There were two question to this:
Actually, it made my Friday eve. That woman has overactive imagination though.
Comments
Post a Comment